Thus Spake An Inert Rebel

<>

Thursday, August 13, 2009

Taking the RTE seriously

Critics may tell what they want, but India is taking the Right To Education very seriously. So seriously that I fear that we are taking it farther than "where no man has ever gone before". In fact we should be renaming it the "Duty to Education" or rather "Duty to go to school". What else can we call the plea of our politicians to not close schools, even if it meant exposing the ultra vulnerable GenY,GenZ,Gen omega, Gen lambda etc to the dreaded "swine flu". I mean one should appreciate people for their concern that many Indian school children may spend their time going to parties and socialising right left and centre if they don't go to school. I mean what other job does the GenY,GenZ,Gen omega, Gen lambda in an ultra poor country have. I fully understand the logic.

But why should we crib about exposing a particularly age group to the swine. Our bank staff have the onerous job of striking as frequently as MTC bus breakdowns and further spend their time watching the classic "india tolaikatchyil muthan muraiaga" movies on krishna jaynthi, aadi ammavasai, avani avittam and the other extremely important religious festival days. And the government staff obviously have more important jobs than working at their desks, to which no one in the right minds will object. If all this has to happen who will lead the country to 2020. What ever will happen to Dr Abdul Kalam's dream.

So all those who demand that schools be closed, just acknowledge that there is superior logic at work and shut up. Period.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

What shall I be ?

I used to have this CBT(maybe NBT) book titled "What shall I be". It was one of my favourites in the bygone days when I had more hair and less opinions. A young kid ponders over the various kinds of professions he can take up, typically the jobs of an engineer, doctor, astronaut and a few other stuff. And typically the father advises him to study hard for the moment and do the dreaming later. And typically I hated the father. The jobs I never intended to pursue were that of the doctor and engineer. The Doctor set I used to have as a child singularly failed to fascinate me. And I suspect most kids just liked the syringe injecting part in the doctors profession (provided it is not injected into them). A Gandhian disdain for violence and the absence of a good syringe in my doctor set meant that I never fancied myself as a doctor. Engineer...ah... I never managed to even build a chair using my mechanical set. So engineering was out of question. I probably wanted to be an astronaut to escape the boredom of school. But after school I realised that it was hard work. And proceeding in this manner I exhausted all the opprtunties listed in the book. Period.

As I grew up I began having problems with the rhetorical question. Why should what shall I be, be a question regards profession? I felt it was typical of a middle class Indian's obsession with Work. Thomas Friedmann may be in awe about how Indians don't mind working for 100 hours a week...I am not. Born in South, into what considers itself an upwardly mobile community, I have generally been an odd man out. I mean I was pretty hard working at an age when boys consider it girlish to study well. My zeal for knowledge was high and I did fairly well in sports too. But the paradise was lost during class 11 and class 12. My friends got serious about studies and post school life, while I became more of a rebel. And by choosing to do physics and ignoring engineering altogether, I became offically an outcaste. After three to four years of being an outcaste, I scraped through into IIT. And lo and behold my social status improved atleast ten-fold. But then I was back to doing what i did best, rebelling and theorising even as my academics went downhill. But my English and Analytical mediocrity got me into one of India's leading software companies. I took the job because my physics was somewhere down the hill out of sight. But then a year of being the "cream of the cream" as the HR used to call us (nasty sense of humour you know), took its toll on me and I quit to rejoin physics. But even that did not happen without me taking a detour into wildlife conservation, a course I should have pursued, but dropped out at the last moment (intha maari nerangalthaan arivu irukkana santhegam varathu..). Till 25, I was firm believer in Sarah Harding's comment in Crichton's Lost World, "You never know what you want to be till you are 25". But then 25 came and went and even after an year I was still wondering what i would like to do all my life. Money failed to motivate me. I had zero ambition. I live in the present and do not intend accummulate for my grandson. You may choose to call it zest for socialism or plain laziness.

That being the short history of my adventures in choosing a job, I am still stuck with the question, what shall I be. Of course I fancy writing. The fly in the ointment is that the literary world does not reciprocate my feeling. So as the literary cognoscenti continue to ignore me, I am forced to look for jobs elsewhere. Maybe you can help me get one. Here is the criteria. 8 hours of work per day. Five days a week only. No boss required. And that is a necessary condition. Performance should not be rated. Prefer to live on campus. Access to libraries and books is a necessary condition. Work skills involve ability to sleep well and argue and moralise on topics on which I am not particularly moral about. Salary is negotiable as long as the food is free. TV and other recreational sources not required. An outlet for self expression is a must. Now maybe the smart folks who glean some inspiration from this blog can help me find a job with that profile. While at it, maybe you people can find out whether there are any "Head of State" vacancies.

Monday, May 18, 2009

So it is that trivial an issue ?

"Tamils complain of marginalisation at the hands of successive governments led by the Sinhalese majority, which came to power at independence in 1948 and took the favoured position the Tamils had enjoyed under the British colonial government"
---C. Bryson Hull and Ranga Sirilal, Yahoo India News

To the best of my knowledge this takes the cake in terms of "awful" journalism in recent times.

PS :(Well wait I saw something on the TOI about the barter system..I'll dig that up and come back..)

Sunday, February 01, 2009

NAGESH.....



We owe a lot to this man...for sprinkling in many a mundane and weary life a few moments of worryless mirth....Mikka nanri thalaiva...

(The choice of the picture was deliberate.....this man could make "god" laugh..)

Thursday, January 01, 2009

"Guidelines for Tamil movie makers" ,circa 2020

The following document is a copy of a proposed state legislation from the year 2020, titled
"Guideline for Tamil moviemakers of 2020 and beyond.....".
I just happen to return from the future and brought this along with me. I hereby officially join Abdul Kalam in eagerly waiting for 2020.


1. Only real life Hindus shall play Hindus on screens. Similarly only Muslims shall play Muslims and Christians shall play Christians. Brahmins have to be played only by Brahmins and Thevars only by Thevars. And same holds for other castes too.
2. Only Tamils shall play Tamil. Non-tamils should play non-tamil's roles only.
3. No negative character shall be named after Gods or Godesses or mythological characters. So names like Ram, Sita, Ramesh, Mahesh, Murugan, Kumarsamy, Kandasamy, Padayappa, Rajeshwari, Lakshmi, Umadevi and so on are banned. Further if any character is shown having even one bad characteristic, then he/she should not be named after Gods and Godesses. There are a plethora of other names like A, Pi, Sqrroot, theta, gamma, alpha, onnu, rendu, athu, ithu, ivan avan, aval, porul,ange, inge, etc that can be used. Same rule holds for Muslim and Christian names too.
4.Also no one including alcoholics should be shown drinking. Same for smoking. Sex can only be implied, as has always been the case.
5.No woman shall be shown in bad light. This requires that women will always be good characters and will never play a negative role. Further all women shall wear traditional decent dresses only. No exposure of skin (except face and hands upto elbows) shall be allowed. Dream sequences as norm are excepted.
6.Family values will always be upheld in movies. So family members shall not be shown in any sort of bad light.
7.NRI's should not be shown in bad light. Especially the rich ones. This is bad for the stock marke and the country's economy.
8.Because of strategic relationships with USA and Isreal, no American or Israeli citizen shall be shown in bad light. And similarly no Pakistani shall be shown in good light.
9.Corporates shall not be shown in any kind of unfavourable vein. Also rich industrialists shall not be portrayed in any unflattering form. Such acts are bad for the economy.
10.Since Hindus believe that food and paper are very sacred, scenes displaying tearing them, stamping on them, throwing them etc won't be allowed.
11. Old people will always be shown respectfully in movies. So even if an old man is shot with a Bofors tank at almost point blank range, the man will fall at the same spot. Also no old person (55 years for women and enuch and 60 for men) shall be shown in bad light.
12. Similarly Politicians, government workers, police and army and ex-army personnel, lawyers, doctors,farmers, bankers, software engineers, BPO employees, scientists and filmmakers shall not be shown in bad vein.
13. State and society (past, present or future) as entities shall not be criticised in any manner.
14. It is expected that movies will generally help towards making a better, brighter and happier community and promote peace and harmony. So it is advised that only such stories be filmed only in such manner lest any one feels hurt, embarassed or unhappy.
15. As a special gesture we would like to honour Mr Vikraman, whose films have followed most of the above rules, even without our asking him to do so. If only all the movie makers had emulated Vikraman, such guidelines would become unnecessary.

Aaaha kilambitaanya kilambittanya

Kodana kodi rasigaigalin vendukolukku inanga.......
"meendum mutRupuLLi...."
Viraivil ungal pakkathu blog'il...

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

More fools we

There are three kinds of fools in the world. People who believe China is Communist. And people who believe China is Communist.And then there is a minority of one who think that a 4 week visit to Beijing to attend a summer school makes them competent enough to comment on the economic and social policies of China.
Kali muthiduthu......

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

A general quiz by any other name......

will still be a general quiz. It can never be a Books Quiz. What we had last weekend at Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan were two Open General quizzes, one which went curiously went with the name of Books Quiz. Samanth Subrmanian's quiz was a pseudo books quiz. Mind you I am not criticising the standard of the questions, but the questions themselves. The prelims was literarly non-literary. Samanth had very smartly explained at the beginning that any written word would be treated as literature, which is fine. But somehow the choice of questions made me feel that the questions normally asked had just been repackaged with a different name. And needless to say we had the usual finalists on stage, making this another session of good quizzing, but not so engaging for the non-finalists. BTW for the record I am pissed off with seeing the same goshti's at all the quiz finals. I have come up with some rules to plainly make it more even a contest and more entertaining. Will write about it at some point.

Monday, February 11, 2008

A real life hero

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Day and Night Tests? What the $#%&

"I wish people would leave Test cricket alone and keep their tinkering to the limited-overs game. What they need to do, if they think they aren't getting enough crowds, is to play less of the damn thing so that when a Test series comes around, people will want to see it instead of saying, 'Just another Test'."...Michael Holding as quoted by Sambit Bal, Courtesy Cricinfo.


Attaboy Mikey. Guess it takes a fast bowler to "bang" in some sense when administrators decide to tamper with the fairer version of the game.